tuskegee study paper – Nursing Paper Help

write an abstract of a reasearch paper
May 4, 2021
Short custom essay papers – The Nursing TermPaper
May 4, 2021

tuskegee study paper – Nursing Paper Help

Tuskegee Study Paper
Read about the U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee in your text and on the following website: https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Provide an overview of what occurred during this experiment. What was the purpose of the experiment? Identify the ethical issues with this study. Finally, if you were a part of an institutional review board, would you approve this study? Why or why not?Requirements:

Review the Module 2 Critical Thinking Rubric for full details on how you will be graded on this assignment.
Rubric
CRJ330 Mod 2 CT

CRJ330 Mod 2 CT

Criteria
Ratings
Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

25.0 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

20.0 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

15.0 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Evaluation

15.0 to >12.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate synthesis and evaluation of course concepts in selected experiment or study.

12.0 to >9.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

9.0 to >6.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in synthesis and evaluation.

6.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate synthesis and evaluation.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources

5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Cites and integrates at least three credible sources, as specified in description.

4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Cites and integrates two credible sources, as specified in description.

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Cites and integrates one credible source, as specified in description.

2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Cites and integrates no credible sources.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style

5.0 to >4.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0 to >3.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0 to >2.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

Module 2: Discussion Forum” aria-describedby=”msf1-previous-desc”>PreviousNext
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

"Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!"

Nursing Coursework